Application of the Ethical Decision-Making Model in the Case Study
Bringing this issue to the perspective of ethics means considering morality (awareness, principles of moral judgment), and ethical behavior of Nurse Amelia Brooks. To begin with, Amelia has to admit her destiny – which might be getting separated from her beliefs and merits. What is important is when she comes to find out that she has inner self contrary to her duty of offering care to everyone and without any prejudice. During this period, she also has to reach her moral outlook as well as examine the autonomy, professional responsibility, and non-maleficence principles. Moral dilemma assessment is a process of balancing the potential harms Sophie and her might suffer because of those actions against the ethical foundations that form the core of her profession. All in all, Amelia should be a moral person who behaves according to her conscience. This is hereby a case of developing a solution that concurrently caters for Sophie’s autonomy as well as does not go against the nature of her job. In addition, it should endeavor to do no harm. This helps her to solve the problem clearly and truthfully, therefore, she can be less likely to contradict ethical principles but rather taking care of all the parties.
Effectiveness of Communication Approaches in the Case Study
In communication strategy evaluation for Nurse Amelia Brooks’ case, it will be mandatory to highlight how useful is open dialogue and addressing them in an empathetic way. Amelia, the nurse, can demonstrate good communication skills by discussing, freely, her moral dilemma with Dr. Rebecca Martin, the obstetrician, and making her personal views clear as to strike a balance between her private conviction and job commitment. This approach promotes mutual understanding and openness, which are the preconditions to a good decision-making. This can only be achieved through collaborative efforts (Smith and Jones, 2023). On the top of that, Dr. Martin must be empathetic in her interactions with Amelia, showing her understanding to the intricacy of her situation and empathy of her struggle. Contrastingly, communication strategies which do not consider or acknowledge Amelia’s concerns may be damaging to trusting and good relationship between the parties. Through the allocation of communication channels such as communication which clearly and respectful; health care professionals are in a position of reducing biases and make a fair situation assessment. Another vital point in this context is to steer away from communication patterns that are biased or even stigmatize people holding different opinions. Such methods are not efficient and thus can jumble up the decision-making process as well as restrain discrimination (Volkow et al., 2021). On the contrary, healthcare professionals ought to focus on subjective assessment criteria, and so that discussions can be the health professionals and the patient can come to an understanding on any misconceptions or problems. Promoting understanding and empathy in communication is a way healthcare professionals abode by ethical standards and to ensure equality in their approaches to patients without regard to the patients’ personal beliefs or backgrounds.
Effectiveness of The Approach Used by the Professional
The ethics model that Nurse Brooks uses would be an example of this because it grounds moral awareness, good judgement, and behavior. Amelia portray moral awareness on the contrary of her character when she recognizes the ethical dilemma that stems from her personal ethical beliefs not in consonance with the principles of the military. Her ethical reasoning surfaces in her concern of Sophie Turner’s free will and Zeek’s welfare along with her own moral compass (Johnson & Thompson, 2022). The moral essence of the character Amelia is evident in the fact of her pronounced understanding of the role of care beyond discrimination, but at the same time, she insists upon upholding her ethical beliefs.
Irrelevant ways which would be based on the issue of ignoring Sophie’s autonomy or expressing personal attitudes would not be very effective. Considering Sophie as one who is powerless and not sympathetic with her beliefs make it an ethical problem and the loss of confidence by healthcare professionals. Not only that, but influencing on the girl’s spirituality without considering her rights is a cause of damage and can blow up and break down the patient-provider relationship. Amelia’s approach embodies the responsible ethics in that it combines professional role with personal beliefs. At the same time, it offers up the protection of Sophie autonomy.
By Amelia’s critically acclaimed moral awareness and judgment of Sophie’s self-determination, she has demonstrated a good accou